Power, Threat, or Military Capabilities assesses two mainstays of international relations, balance of power and balance of threat, using the case of US balancing against the Soviet Union in the later Cold War. It also proposes balance of military capabilities, which uses offense-defense theory to argue that countries balance against the ability of others to conquer or compel them.
Power, Threat, or Military Capabilities finds that the US was more powerful than the Soviet Union so US behavior is not explained by balance of power. The US did not perceive the Soviet Union as likely to initiate war or to run risks that might lead to war so US behavior is not explained by balance of threat. This book determines that the US was concerned about its ability to defend Europe and the Persian Gulf so US behavior is explained by balance of military capabilities.
Power, Threat, or Military Capabilities finds that the US was more powerful than the Soviet Union so US behavior is not explained by balance of power. The US did not perceive the Soviet Union as likely to initiate war or to run risks that might lead to war so US behavior is not explained by balance of threat. This book determines that the US was concerned about its ability to defend Europe and the Persian Gulf so US behavior is explained by balance of military capabilities.
Maksa helposti kortilla, Klarnalla, Apple Paylla tai Google Paylla. Etkö ole tyytyväinen? Sinulla on aina 14 päivän palautusoikeus. Lue lisää ehdoistamme. Jos sinulla on kysyttävää, lähetä meille sähköpostia osoitteeseen hello@memmo.org.
Memmo tekee opiskelusta helpompaa – missä päin maailmaa ikinä oletkin. Meillä yhdistät kurssikirjat ja fiksut opiskelutyökalut yhteen paikkaan: tiivistelmät, visat, podcastit ja muistikortit. Ja sitten Ted, opiskelukaverisi, joka vastaa kaikkeen, mitä ikinä mietitkin. Yli 50 000 opiskelijaa opiskelee jo täällä – rakennettu auttamaan sinua oppimaan nopeammin ja stressaamaan vähemmän.